LESS than 10 years ago the effort of walking five minutes to the shops was too much for Sandra Middleton.
A mystery illness, believed to be genetic, had been gradually eroding her kidney function and pushing up her blood pressure for decades.
The retired school secretary from Dundee, 63, said: “When I came home from work, that was me. I was putting my feet up and falling asleep. Even in work instead of running around with messages I had to write them out and hand them to other people to take round.
“We live about a five-minute walk from the shops but I wouldn’t walk, I would take the car. I wouldn’t walk anywhere.”
By June 2003, Sandra needed a kidney transplant to survive. Her brother was tested first but was not a suitable match, so husband Brian stepped in.
He said: “I was delighted to be a donor match. We’d been married 30-odd years. I wasn’t a great match but with all the drugs they’ve got now, they’re able to do a lot more. I worked with [technology firm] NCR in Dundee at the time and they were very helpful and very supportive so financially going through the operation, there was no problem from that angle. I was able to go back to work about eight weeks later.
“There was a big difference for Sandra. She felt a lot stronger. It changed both of our lives, to be honest. Near the end, before the operation, it was always a thought to go out, but now Sandra is able to go out the same as I am.”
The case is one of a loved one donating a kidney to save the other’s life – but what about a donor market?
“It makes me uncomfortable,” said Mrs Middleton. “If it’s regulated on the NHS that’s better because people are then doing it because they want to – but I’m still not sure.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article