CHILDREN may be less likely to develop nut allergies if their mothers eat nuts during pregnancy, a study has shown.
Scientists analysed data on more than 8000 American children, including 140 who had peanut or tree nut (P/TN) allergies.
Those with non-allergic mothers who ate nuts five times a week or more turned out to have the lowest P/TN allergy risk.
The findings show mothers-to-be may have been wrongly advised in the past to avoid nuts.
"Our study showed increased peanut consumption by pregnant mothers who weren't nut allergic was associated with lower risk of peanut allergy in their offspring," said US lead researcher Dr Michael Young, from Boston Children's Hospital.
At the end of the 1990s it was widely assumed consuming nuts risked sensitising children. For years mothers in the US were advised to avoid all nuts while pregnant and breast feeding and to keep their children away from peanuts until they were three years of age. But because of lack of evidence, the guidance was rescinded in 2008.
In the US, the prevalence of childhood peanut allergy has more than tripled from 0.4% in 1997 to 1.4% in 2010.
"No one can say for sure if the avoidance recommendation for peanuts was related to the rising number of peanut allergies seen in the late 1990s and early 2000s, but one thing is certain: it did not stop the increase," Dr Young added. "It was clear that a new approach was needed, opening the door for new research."
He stressed that the findings, published in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, only showed an association, not a cause-and-effect relationship.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article