LEADING scientists have appealed to world health bosses not to clamp down on e-cigarettes.
A total of 53 experts from 15 countries including the United Kingdom wrote to the World Health Organisation (WHO) to urge it not to "control and suppress" the devices, saying they have the potential to save millions of lives.
The WHO is preparing to publish recommendations about e-cigarettes to governments later this year.
The letter, whose signatories include Professor Linda Bauld, of Stirling University, urged the global health adviser not to impose regulations on the products in the same way it does with conventional cigarettes.
It said: "The potential for tobacco harm reduction products to reduce the burden of smoking-related disease is very large, and these products could be among the most significant health innovations of the 21st Century - perhaps saving millions of lives.
"The urge to control and suppress them as tobacco products should be resisted and instead regulation that is fit for purpose and designed to realise the potential should be championed by WHO."
The authors of the letter -including experts who have advised the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) on its guidelines about reducing the harm from tobacco -published the letter after claiming to have seen a leaked document from the WHO which labelled the e-cigarettes as a "threat".
Signatory, Professor Robert West, of University College London, said: "For the WHO to suggest e-cigarettes are as risky as other tobacco products would send an erroneous message to the millions of current e-cigarette users who have used them to quit smoking.
"It would discourage smokers from trying them and we would miss out on a major opportunity to reduce smoke-related deaths."
Research published last week by Professor West claims e-cigarettes can help improve the success rate of people trying to quit smoking by 60 per cent compared to nicotine patches or gum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article