Over £14,000 of taxpayers' money has been spent on calls to the speaking clock - one-third of it in the last year alone, according to figures released by public bodies.
Calls to the premium-rate line are "a hideous waste of money" at a time of tight budgets and a proliferation of clocks on phones and computers, according to the Conservative Party, which obtained the figures.
Councils are the biggest spenders, making £12,947 of calls since 2008/09, health boards have amassed £1551, and the Scottish Government spent £30.
Total speaking clock call charges have increased sixfold in the last five years from £852.79 in 2008/09 to £5436 in 2012/13, despite the growing availability of accurate digital sources.
North Ayrshire was the biggest spending council (£2206), while NHS Lanarkshire spent the most among health boards.
The Tories have called for the 31 pence-per-call number to be blocked on public-sector phones, amid suggestions staff may be using it as "a distraction tactic when the boss is around".
Conservative chief whip John Lamont said: "The total amount may be small in comparison to overall public budgets, but it's still a hideous waste of money.
"It beggars belief more councils and health boards have not put a block on this.
"If staff are calling 123 as a distraction tactic when the boss is around, that's even more inexcusable."
He added: "This waste of taxpayers' money is the sort of thing that infuriates the public."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article