BEST-SELLING author Janice Galloway has told of her relief after she won a court order banning her ex-lover from contacting her for 10 years.
Concert pianist Graeme McNaught, 55, has twice walked free from court on charges of stalking Miss Galloway despite subjecting her to years of harassment.
The writer resorted to launching a civil action against McNaught and has now seen him hit with a lengthy ban on approaching her.
Miss Galloway, 60, of Uddingston, Lanarkshire, said: "I am pleased, and hugely relieved, there has been some redress following the ordeal of two separate court cases which returned verdicts of culpability for harassment over what is now a 17-year period.
"A grant of order for 10 years is unusual, I believe, and allows time for Mr McNaught to put in place some useful measures against it happening again."
At a hearing at Hamilton Sheriff Court lawyers for Miss Galloway asked for the banning order following a string of criminal hearings in the past year.
McNaught, of Mount Vernon, Glasgow, has twice walked free from trials after concerns were raised over his mental health.
In May a jury took less than an hour to acquit him on the grounds of insanity. McNaught was held in a psychiatric unit but allowed to return home after a sheriff heard he had responded well to treatment.
And last year an examination of facts heard a sheriff rule McNaught had carried out a campaign of stalking against Miss Galloway but his health prevented action being taken against him.
McNaught, who was not at the most recent hearing, had not opposed the non-harassment order which was granted by Sheriff George Jamieson.
He will now face criminal proceedings and possible jail time if he breaks the order.
Miss Galloway, author of novels The Trick is to Keep Breathing, Foreign Parts and Blood, has called for changes to the law on stalking and said she hoped her victory would help other victims.
She added: "This redress, however, was found via civil court only. Had I not been eligible for legal aid to pursue things in this way, it would have been unaffordable.
"This makes me worry for most others in what was my position. I am further well aware that criminal court would again be where things were referred following any rearrest, which may only lead to another poor fit with existing criminal law.
"I hope this does not happen. Better still, perhaps some change following cases of stalking which recognises the victim as central may be found.
"More people than me are affected by the failures I have met. It would be good to feel the criminal cases had at least some possibility of lasting use for the future."
Miss Galloway had earlier told how she felt "suicidal" as McNaught repeatedly tried to contact her.
She also revealed she feared being a victim of "revenge porn" after McNaught threatened to publish naked photographs of her pregnant.
The couple, who have a son James, were in a relationship for around six years before separating in 1996.
Miss Galloway told the court case earlier this year that she was left at "breaking point" because of his behaviour. She also told the court McNaught said he only wanted to contact his son but had carried on contacting her even though James now lives in London.
She added: "I thought when James became aged to be contacted himself at 16 that this would all stop but we are now six years on and it is still happening.
"I have spent nearly two decades trying to get Graeme to stop contacting me. I do not want anything from him and when I do get something it is extremely distressing.
"He pretends he has a good reason for contacting me but I can't see it. He would also contact people I know and try and make me professionally toxic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article