FORMER Sun editor Rebekah Brooks has revealed her "embarrassment" at turning down the exclusive story on the MPs' expenses scandal to the Old Bailey.
Giving evidence in the phone-hacking trial, Mrs Brooks admitted that, "in terms of errors of judgment" it was "quite high on my list". She also described being summoned to Downing Street over information leaked by a public official about an alleged Iraqi plot to launch an anthrax attack on the UK.
Mrs Brooks, 45, said her news team approached her about the expenses story in spring 2009 - a month before it was broken by The Daily Telegraph. She said: "My news team [told] me they had heard that the unredacted information to do with MPs' expenses could be available. It was going to cost quite a lot of money.
"I thought about it for too long. I should have gone ahead. In terms of errors of judgment, [it's] probably quite high on my list." She added: "It was quite embarrassing we didn't get it."
Mrs Brooks, of Churchill, Oxfordshire, who denies conspiring to hack phones, conspiring to commit misconduct in public office and conspiring to pervert the course of justice, was in the witness box for a sixth day of evidence. She also told the court she authorised a payment to a public official for leaked information about the possible anthrax attack.
She said she was deputy editor of The Sun in 1998 when it was contacted by someone alleging a "cover-up" by the security services over the alleged terror plot.
Mrs Brooks said she authorised a journalist to "enter into an agreement with the public official if the story turned out to be true".
She said she was called to Downing Street with representatives from MI5, MI6 and GCHQ before the story had been published.
"They tried to encourage us not to publish," she said. "The public had a right to know."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article