A RELATIVE of Sir William Burrell has voiced concerns over plans to take part of his priceless collection on an international tour.
He gifted his priceless collection of art to the City of Glasgow in 1944 on condition that it was never transported abroad.
The city council hopes for items from the Burrell Collection in Pollok Park, Glasgow, to go on temporary loan to the British Museum.
It is sponsoring a Private Bill at Holyrood in an attempt to alter the terms of Burrell's deed of gift and allow the move.
Mona Dickinson, a grand-daughter of Mary Burrell, Sir William's sister, who lives in Lincolnshire, said neither she nor the wider family were consulted by the council or the trustees of the Burrell Collection about the plans.
She said: "I suspect they have tried to smuggle this through. This debate was thoroughly rehearsed in 1997.
"Experts warned then, as now, that every time you wrap and unwrap a tapestry, some sort of damage can occur. It is inevitable.
"We should leave matters as they are."
Neil MacGregor, director of the British Museum, has said touring the Burrell would be "of real public benefit", while critics warn of the risk involved.
An art expert wrote in Museums Journal that the terms of a gift and the original donor's wishes should be upheld if there is no surviving family member with whom to renegotiate the terms of the gift. Michael Daley, director of ArtWatch UK, said that art objects should not be subject to "curatorial churning".
The Scottish Parliament has heard evidence from an American lawyer who claimed several paintings in a £15 billion art collection held in Philidelphia were damaged during transit.
Loosened paint had to be reset on a Picasso painting when it arrived in Tokyo, and creases had appeared on a Matisse when it arrived in Washington.
A spokesman for Glasgow Life said: "Neither the city nor the trustees would consider any loan that placed an object at risk."
Pollok Park is due to have a £40 million restoration between 2016 and 2020.
A similar move to lift restrictions in 1997 failed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article