A GOVERNMENT scheme designed to protect tenants' cash from unscrupulous landlords is facing calls for an overhaul amid concerns the Crown receive £1million in unclaimed deposits by 2018.
Less than three years after new tenancy deposit regulations came in to force in Scotland, those administering the initiative are sitting on unclaimed monies totalling £400,000. However, with the pot constantly growing and the legislation having no set plans for unclaimed cash, Scotland's largest operator of the scheme has said it has been legally instructed it will be claimed after six years by the Crown. Predictions are that it will top £1million by 2018.
Jennifer Paice, chief executive of SafeDeposits Scotland, has now called foe clarity in the legislation over the uncollected deposit and said the money would be better utilised improving the private rental market, which has around 330,000 properties in Scotland with the number of households living within it increasing by 65 er cent since 2001.
The call has been backed by student leaders, with those in education a major constituency of those living within the private rented sector.
Ms Paice, whose not-for-profit organisation has over 60 per cent of the tenancy deposit market, said when introduced in 2012 there were no provisions in the schemes to deal with the eventuality of unclaimed deposits as noone predicted it as an issue.
Ms Paice said: "We were not expecting this scenario. No one was. But we've since taken advice from our own solicitors over what happens as there's no provisions in the scheme. We've been told that like many other unclaimed assets it reverts to the Crown. As a not-for-profit we can't keep it.
"We've also met with ministers who she's our concerns."
She added: "What we're now asking the Government for is a change to the law, where the unclaimed cash goes into a trust to help improve the private sector.
"That's everything from supporting tenants' groups, making all involved in the sector aware of legislative changes and generally helping professionalise the private rented sector."
The schemes were introduced in 2012 to deal with the problems relating to landlords and letting agents who unfairly withhold deposits from tenants.
Landlords are legally responsible for registering with a scheme and for lodging a tenant's deposit there within 30 days of a tenancy starting.
The scheme has been hailed as a major benefit to tenants in dispute with a landlord over whether all of their deposit, or a proportion of it, should be withheld due to alleged damage.
The Scottish Government said last autumn that up to August 274,055 deposits worth £182 million had been registered.
Gordon Maloney, president of NUS Scotland, said: "It's really worrying that such a significant amount of deposits are going unclaimed, a sign that tenants either don't know their rights or aren't able to exercise them.
"When tenants continue to see rents increasing by scandalous amounts, and the Scottish private rented sector is in need of investment and reform, not least regulating the cost to tenants, the last place unclaimed deposits should be going is into the UK Government's bank account.
"Given the huge amount of deposits that are going unclaimed, and when the sector remains in need of investment, we must see a change in the way things work so that this money can remain in Scotland and more can be put into services that benefit tenants."
Housing Minister Margaret Burgess said: "Tenancy Deposit Schemes provide free and independent adjudication to resolve disputes between tenants and landlords, making decisions over the return of deposits fairer and more transparent.
"The laws governing the schemes allow tenants to reclaim money owed to them at any time after the end of a tenancy. There is no statutory time limit."
XREF LETTERS Nothing in the scheme rules provides for unclaimed money to be paid to anyone. Specifically it does not go to the Scottish Government or the UK Government."
xr
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article