PRIME Minister David Cameron must back his words with "decisive and urgent action" to tackle the spectre of antibiotic resistance, a committee of MPs has said.
Days after delivering a call to defeat superbugs, Mr Cameron was urged not to wait for the outcome of a two-year review addressing the problem.
Steps had to be taken now to ensure antibiotics were no longer given to people and animals inappropriately, said the Science and Technology Committee.
There was also a need for more Government-funded research, better training of doctors, public awareness campaigns, and "rapid and accurate diagnostic tests", the committee found.
A report from the MPs said: "The unnecessary prescription of antibiotics has contributed to the acceleration of antibiotic resistance."
Last week Mr Cameron announced the appointment of former Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O'Neill as head of an expert group conducting the new review, which will focus on the global problem of drug resistance.
The report stressed policy on antibiotics had to be evidence-based, adding: "There is a lack of data on the post-prescription behaviour of patients, and we suggest the Government develops a system for monitoring this.
"Furthermore, there is a lack of information and evidence on the link between resistance in animal pathogens, the environment, and resistance in human pathogens.
"The Government cannot rely on the notion that curiosity-driven research will provide the information it needs and must plan to fund necessary research directly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article