FORMER military top brass have raised warnings about the crisis in Iraq as David Cameron headed to a Cornish beach on his second holiday of the summer.
Former head of the Royal Navy Lord West of Spithead warned there was a worrying lack of clarity about the UK's strategy and a danger of "mission creep".
General Sir Richard Dannatt, former head of the British Army, meanwhile insisted "the nation would expect" Parliament to be recalled to allow MPs and peers to debate Britain's growing involvement in the conflict and said it was unwise for the Government to publicly rule out British boots on the ground.
Iraqi security forces have launched an offensive to take back the city of Tikrit, which has been occupied by Islamic State (IS) since June, following Monday's victory in the retaking of the Mosul Dam from militants.
Britain is poised to provide weapons to Kurdish troops fighting the extremists of IS in northern Iraq as well as continued humanitarian aid.
First Minister Alex Salmond said the Scottish Government was extremely concerned about the humanitarian situation in northern Iraq and had written to the UK Government to offer assistance.
But he added: "In terms of any military intervention it is imperative that the UK Government moves through the United Nations route and does not repeat the tragic mistakes of 11 years ago. There can be no effective military action without international legality.
"The appalling consequences of previous blunders in this regard are what are visiting us now in Iraq and elsewhere."
As the debate over Britain's role continued to rage, the Prime Minister was photographed sipping coffee with wife Samantha at Surfside cafe on Polzeath beach in Wadebridge.
The couple appeared relaxed as they sat at a window table that overlooked a busy beach.
Mr Cameron has insisted he remains in control during the holiday and is "always within a few feet of a BlackBerry".
Sir Richard, who was a defence adviser to the PM after he retired as chief of the general staff in 2009, warned that MPs and Lords would get "very frustrated" if they did not get to address the situation before Parliament sits again. MPs are due to return briefly in September but peers will not have a chance to debate the issue until October.
Speaking from Cornwall, Sir Richard told the BBC: "I think there will come a point, as this general set of circumstances unfolds, when Parliament needs to come back together, people need to have a full debate about it and express their point of view.
"I think the nation would expect that."
Lord West, former First Sea Lord, told a newspaper: "We need to be very certain of our ultimate aim and we don't seem to have great clarity of vision about what we are going to do there. It is very worrying.
"There is always a danger of mission creep. We need to be very clear on our game plan - what, at the end, is going to make our nation and the globe more secure.
"The problem with getting involved is there is no way you want to become fully involved. It would be a dangerous step to have troops on the ground.
"But you look at what the Islamic State is doing and it is incumbent to do something. We should use limited military capabilities: reconnaissance capabilities, intelligence, possibly airstrikes and using Special Forces to mark targets for firing from drones."
Mr Cameron has pledged that the UK will not be "dragged into a war in Iraq" but Labour has criticised the Government's strategy, claiming the British role in the crisis is unclear.
Earlier this month, the PM cut short a trip to Portugal to respond to the emergency and has insisted he will do the same again "instantly" if necessary.
"Wherever I am, wherever I am in the world I am always within a few feet of a BlackBerry and an ability to manage things should they need to be managed," he said.
"And indeed, as I have done on I think almost every holiday that I have enjoyed over the last few years, to return instantly should that be necessary."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article