Michelin-starred chefs have criticised "laborious" hygiene inspections of their kitchens which they claim are causing major problems for restaurateurs.
Andrew Fairlie, whose two-starred restaurant at Gleneagles failed an inspection in June, joined Tom Kitchin and Tony Borthwick in voicing concern about the regime overseen by the Food Standards Agency.
Mr Fairlie said the importance given to administration was "bizarre" while one of the problems raised in his kitchen was a member of staff putting soap on their hands before water when washing their hands.
"It borders on the surreal," he said. "We've now had to employ a consultant to meet the laborious requirements set out by the inspectorate."
Mr Kitchin added: "We expect cleanliness, we expect our chefs to take responsibility. Yes, of course we're here to to live by guidelines but I think there's an attitude of the 'sheriff' to some of the inspectors. Some of them are like parking inspectors trying to make your life miserable."
Mr Borthwick, who runs The Plumed Horse in Leith, added: "We can be running a brilliant restaurant but if I forget to record the fridge temperatures for a week I'm told I'm a bad boy.
"I check my fridge a hundred times a day but I don't always have time to write it down. In the eyes of an inspector that could make me a bad chef."
The FSA said the conduct of inspections, which are carried out by local authority staff, was governed by a code of practice on food law enforcement and the system was regularly audited.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article