PILOT parishes are to be launched to test new ways of spreading power and pastoral care in the Church of Scotland as it attempts to weather a 'serious storm' of challenges to its future.
A declining membership, an ageing leadership, a shortage of ministers and a disengagement from church by younger generations has forced the Kirk to overhaul its local leadership structures.
The organisation said it is facing "a serious storm which necessitates change" in the biggest shake-up of Kirk sessions and presbyteries for centuries.
The Church's Panel on Review and Reform is to move to identify 20 pilot congregations where decision-making structures and responsibilities could be reconsidered.
It could lead to elders conducting funerals and services to avoid merging with neighbouring parishes .
Panel convener Donald Campbell presented the ground-breaking report to the assembly which will also examine the way the Church makes decisions.
He said in the report: "Over the last 25 years, the Church of Scotland has largely followed a policy of unions and readjustments to maintain a situation where each parish is served by a full-time minister of Word and Sacrament.
"However, with the projected fall in the number of ministers - around 25 per cent to 30 per cent within the next five years - continuing to match the number of parishes to the number of available ministers would require most churches to enter into a union or multiple link."
Many in rural presbyteries have pushed for a move away from merging parishes.
A rigorous assessment process for ministers and Kirk sessions - currently local administration bodies - would be used to choose the 20 pilot congregations.
This would be followed by a two to three year period which would "focus on developing and equipping local leaders to reshape the congregation's work according to its locality".
Mr Campbell also said: "The impression given at the consultations was that presbyteries in city and urban areas would prefer to keep roughly the number of congregations currently in presbytery plans, albeit it with a little readjustment where local parties agree, with new leadership positions created at a local level in order to sustain and build local congregations.
"There is a growing need to involve others in sharing the responsibilities carried by ministers as the number of ministers declines.
"The two areas highlighted most frequently in this respect are leading worship and conducting funerals.
"During consultations with presbyteries, it was clear that people could discern elders or others who might share these responsibilities provided appropriate training was given which would be accessible and relevant."
The assembly agreed to the pilot plans and also to consider changes to decision-making.
Rev Neil Meyer, Kintore, Gordon Presbytery, said: "The principle (current structure's) weakness is that it is fundamentally binary and adversarial.
"Every time we deal with something controversial we have to be adversarial about it."
Rev Paraic Reamonn, of St Andrew's, Presbytery of Jerusalem, said that the decision made on allowing gay clergy in civil partnerships could have been made earlier under one majority vote but that the current structure allowed greater discussion.
Syria and Lebanon Rev Ibrahim Nseir said that Christian churches in Syria are in need of urgent support.
He highlighted the kidnapping and killing of priests and bishops.
Rev Ram Kumar Budhathoki, of Nepal Ebenezer Bible College, was with his congregation when hit by recent earthquakes.
He said: "Around 8,500 people have lost their lives, 20,000 are seriously injured.
"The survivors are traumatised. We have lost buildings and seeds are lost under the mud. We want your prayer and need practical support to rebuild the country.
"Please send us your help and encouragement. Please continue to keep yourselves informed about what is happening."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article