RADICAL plans could see community groups given the right to buy land or buildings that are unused and causing problems even if the owner does not wish to sell.
The new compulsory purchase powers – proposed as part of the Scottish Government's Community Empowerment Bill – were welcomed by activists although business leaders were not as supportive.
Community compulsory purchase was suggested by local government minister Derek Mackay as he stepped up a public consultation on the bill. He also outlined plans for "participatory budgeting" which would give community groups control over local authority funds.
The fresh proposals have been added to a list of other ideas first set out when the Government's exploratory consultation was launched in June.
They include granting local groups an urban right to buy, mirroring existing legislation which allows rural communities to buy land where they live and work if it comes on the market.
Community groups could also be given the right to take over unused or underused public or privately owned land if the owners cannot prove they have a future use for it.
The plan has been called a "community right to grow" and raises the prospect of gardens and allotments springing up on derelict plots in towns and cities.
Mr Mackay widened the range of proposals this week as he sought to stimulate interest in the consultation, which ends on September 26.
Yesterday he described the Community Empowerment Bill as "potentially the biggest transfer of power since devolution".
He added: "This consultation sets out ideas to support Scotland's communities to take independent action to achieve their goals and aspirations and to have their voices heard in the decisions that affect them.
"The ideas in this consultation are designed to strengthen community participation, unlock enterprising community development and renew communities. These ideas were developed following discussions with the wider public, private, third and community sectors. We want to see how we can remove bureaucratic barriers and develop a meaningful and effective legislative framework to support community activity."
However, CBI Scotland said owners often had good reasons for leaving land or buildings unused. Assistant director David Lonsdale said: "Scottish ministers are already seeking to introduce an £18 million-a-year business rates penalty on firms which have empty premises, and this move could add an extra layer of uncertainty and make it even harder to attract investment into vacant commercial or industrial properties or land."
But Mark McRitchie, chief executive of the Community Central Hall in Maryhill, Glasgow, said: "It is about creating a positive culture. Local authorities and others worry there is threat. But this is about helping community organisations and development trusts who are used to rolling up their sleeves and doing things.
"It could make the difference between projects happening or not and allowing facilities to be used in a better way."
For groups such as the North Glasgow Community Food Initiative (NGCFI) – which encourages people to get involved in growing food and eating healthily – the plans will make it easier for them to access land.
Martha Wardrop, chairman of NGCFI, said: "For organisations keen on growing fruit and vegetables in urban areas, good quality land is very precious.
"If community organisations can better access land, and bring it back into productive use for the benefit of local people and promote better health and physical activity, then it should be welcomed.
"We have relied on leases before. This plan would open up opportunities for us to secure land on a permanent basis."
A bill will follow the consultation next year and new powers are expected to come into force in 2014.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article