IT is a village surrounded by flourishing forests so when the local council delivered a community Christmas tree "like a match" the natives were not filled with festive cheer.
IT is a village surrounded by flourishing forests so when the local council delivered a community Christmas tree "like a match" the natives were not filled with festive cheer.
People complained in their droves but Argyll and Bute Council blamed heath and safety for restricting the size of the tree meant to bring the spirit of Christmas into Tarbert.
Officials claimed the village's tree was restricted to 12ft because a bigger one would need longer support ropes and there was no space for them.
But the public outcry continued, centred on the tree's skinny size zero frame, and feelings ran so high that the council has been forced to deliver a replacement.
Steven Hamlin, who runs the All things Tarbert Facebook page, said: "Everybody started phoning the council about it and the council then accepted the complaints, replaced the tree and gave us new Christmas lights."
Jane Knowles, commenting on Facebook, said: "Trees must be hard to get round Tarbert, it's not like we're surrounded by forests full of lovely trees!"
A spokesman for Argyll and Bute Council said the council spends around £100,000 a year providing local communities with Christmas lights and trees.
He claimed the tree delivered to Tarbert was smaller than in other towns because of the limitations of the site, which was small and exposed.
He said: "Public safety is our primary consideration when selecting and siting Christmas trees."
But he added that, after receiving complaints, the council had sent workers to look at the tree.
He said: "We inspected the Tarbert tree and were of the view that it had not transported well from the forest to the site. We arranged to replace the tree."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article