David Milne broke down as he begged Aberdeenshire Council to block the use of compulsory purchase powers to remove him from his house on the Menie Estate.
However, councillors rejected the call in favour of a motion of no action, deciding to wait for a full detailed report.
About 90 protesters gathered outside the Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre yesterday. Placards of the American tycoon depicted as the devil and signs reading “No to CPOs” were held aloft as Mr Milne handed a petition with 15,000 signatures to one of the council’s law officers.
The feeling inside was one of anger as councillors refused to give any relief to the anxious residents: David and Moira Milne, Michael and Sheila Forbes, Susan and John Munro, Mark and Gillian Hewson, and farmer George Moir.
During the meeting, Mr Milne pleaded for an end to the “intolerable psychological torture” brought on by the threat of compulsory purchase of his home.
He said: “I am here to ask you to support the motion that this council will not use its powers of compulsory purchase in support of a commercial leisure development, to throw Aberdeenshire residents out of their homes and off their land.”
Mr Milne, who bought his home at Hermit Point 17 years ago, stressed that his property was not for sale and that councillors should not give the Trump Organisation more time to negotiate.
He added: “I don’t know how many of you have even tried to imagine what it is like not knowing if your home will be your own for much longer, not knowing if the next birthday or Christmas will be the last in your own house.
“I ask you now to stand up for your own personal conscience, stand up for ethics, stand up for morals and stand up for Aberdeenshire.”
Following the landslide vote, 57 to six, shouts of “spineless” and “cowards” rang out from the packed public benches.
Afterwards, Mr Milne said: “I am extremely disappointed, tending towards furious, at the cowardice and apparent collusion of this council.
“They have disgraced themselves by refusing to take action on an element of conscience, morals and ethics.”
Michael Forbes, another resident facing eviction, said he was not surprised by the outcome. He added: “They are complete cowards. There’s still a dirty cloud hanging over our heads, but we’re not finished. The more he [Trump] bullies, the worse I get.”
Martin Ford, the councillor who put forward the defeated motion, said: “This is a failure of leadership by the council and it’s very disappointing.
“The position the council has taken is that it probably, almost certainly, won’t use compulsory purchase, but it won’t say so. They should have had the cloud lifted from them today. Once again the council has let the residents of Aberdeenshire down.”
Leader of Aberdeenshire Council Anne Robertson said there had been “significant misunderstanding” relating to the purpose of the meeting.
“This meeting of Aberdeenshire Council has not been asked to consider compulsory purchase orders,” she said. “We do not have a detailed report before us and we are not in the position to make a decision today.
“It would not be appropriate to make that decision without all of the facts.”
Councillor Joanna Strathdee expressed “heartfelt sympathy” for the residents, but said agreeing to the motion could affect future compulsory purchase orders that might be needed to cover high-profile projects such as the Aberdeen peripheral route or the dualling of the A90.
She added: “It could also impinge on the council’s ability to acquire a site for a primary school, for example.”
But Mr Ford described references to roads projects and other potential future schemes as a “fudge” and said supporting the motion would give residents “peace of mind”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article