Five concierges at a Glasgow high rise complex have been sacked amid concerns over drug dealing.
The men were dismissed by the city's biggest social landlord after CCTV was allegedly switched off, allowing criminals in to the buildings unseen.
It is understood all five, none of whom are themselves accused of selling drugs, insist they have done nothing wrong. They have all appealed against their dismissals.
Glasgow Housing Association, which owns the complex where they worked, declined to say anything on the case.
A GHA spokeswoman said: "We cannot comment on individual cases as our internal disciplinary process is on-going.
"However, I can confirm we have a zero-tolerance approach to such matters and will continue in all such cases to take immediate and appropriate action."
The five men were all involved in what used to be called concierge work. Their posts have now been renamed as "environmental operatives" but their work still includes ensuring the security of high-rise buildings.
GHA and other parts of Glasgow's public sector work increasingly closely with police on ensuring the security of their buildings and assets and sharing intelligence about drug dealing.
Police officers are seconded to GHA to work on security, including efforts to tackle to scourge of heroin and other drugs in vulnerable residents.
The landlord has evicted drug dealers in the past and is particularly aware of the dangers they present to its staff and tenants.
Earlier this year, however, an attempt to remove a man who grew cannabis in one of its multi-storey blocks failed. It was an isolated incident, a sheriff decided.
Tenants have previously complained of drugs paraphernalia found in communal closes and stairways, including high rises.
In recent years, a zero tolerance policy has therefore been adopted to keep such buildings safe. There remains, however, a disproportionate number of problem drug users in social housing.
The concierge sackings were revealed after emerged that police in April stopped and seized a van belonging to Glasgow City council construction giants City Building as part of a £200,000 drugs haul.
As part of a major operation, officers crashed in to the vehicle before detaining and then arresting its two occupants on suspicion of dealing.
They then stopped another vehicle, car, and detained then arrested its driver.
The operation, carried out with support from Glasgow City Council, which owns and runs City Building, was understood to focus on the distribution of amphetamines across north Glasgow.
Nobody was hurt in the crash - a bumper-to-bumper collision between the police car and the van came to a halt. The stop was made at 8pm on April 13 in Barmulloch, north Glasgow.
One of the men in the City Building van was Michael McKenna, 24, an electrician for the construction firm. He has since resigned his post, the Herald understands.
Mr McKenna's is the step-brother of the partner of Paul Carey, the Labour councillor who until late last year chaired City Building.
There is no suggestion Mr Carey or his partner had any involvement in the incident or any of the matters under investigation. The councillor said: "I don't know anything about it."
A Police Scotland spokesman said: "Detailed searches of the vehicles were conducted at Stewart Street where officers recovered quantities of cocaine, diamorphine and amphetamine with an estimated potential street value of £200,000.
"A 24 year-old, 31 year-old and 42 year-old man were later arrested for alleged drugs offences and held in custody for court."
A city council spokesman added: "Any business can be a target for organised crime and public bodies are no different. We work closely with Police Scotland to identify and minimise risks and share information."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article