SCOTLAND's new adoption register is only being used by about half of councils, with just eight adoptions made using the scheme in its first year.
Local authorities have been hesitant to refer children and adoptive families to the register, which was set up last year in a bid to speed up and increase adoptions, due to data protection concerns.
The Herald understands only 18 of the country's 32 authorities have signed up to the scheme following confusion over who is responsible for confidential information at different stages of the process.
The Scottish Government, which funded the register for its first three years at a cost of almost £300,000, says the issues have now been addressed. However, adoption campaigners said that the slow progress was frustrating.
Fiona Lettice, Scotland development manager for Adoption UK, a charity that represents adoptive families, said: "It's really frustrating that local authorities have been slow to join up. There are children languishing in the care system and we should be using any way that we can to find families for these children.
"There's been a problem with data protection and some councils were worried about signing up, but as far as I understand, this has been resolved and there is now a data-sharing agreement in place.
"I would certainly encourage every council in Scotland to join the register. It's an important way of finding a suitable match for children."
Deirdre Cilliers, joint head of social services for Stirling and Clackmannanshire councils, which use the register, said: "The Scottish Adoption Register has not been widely used by all local authorities due to concerns about the confidentiality of the information.
"I understand that one of the concerns has been about the requirement by some local authorities to have explicit agreements in place in terms of who the information referred to in the register belongs to.
"This issue is being addressed by the Scottish Government but has resulted in far fewer placements being made than had been expected.
"We are optimistic that more agencies will sign up, as this potentially would increase options for children in Scotland.
"Our view is that this is early days and if eight matches have been made so far then that is probably eight more than would have happened without the register."
In 2011, at least 12,000 children in Scotland were in care, while only about 300 were adopted.
Waiting times for children and approved adoptive families varied greatly, from a matter of months to five years.
The British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF) was instructed by the SNP Government to set up the adoption register in March last year.
It is being run on a pilot basis for three years to establish whether or not it will be as successful as the adoption register for England and Wales, which has matched more than 1400 children and adoptive parents since its inception in 2004.
Sue Brunton, project leader for Scotland's register, said: "Adoption information from a number of different local authorities and charities is shared with the register and what we've had to do is ensure we have the necessary checks in place to be compliant with data protection.
"Penetration tests have been carried out – that's where you pay somebody to hack into the system to ensure that data is suitably protected.
"I do think the register is moving in the right direction. If I was sitting here at the end of next year with these figures, I might not be happy. I would like to have the majority of authorities referring to us by then."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article