THE Culture Secretary has admitted the crisis-hit arts funding body has "not delivered" what the artistic community needs.
Fiona Hyslop, however, said she has been heartened by the recent responses of the Creative Scotland board to the letter of protest signed by more than 400 artists.
Speaking at the Culture Committee of the Scottish Parliament, Ms Hyslop reiterated her desire for Creative Scotland to "sort out" its problems, internally and externally.
She said trust between the arts funding and artists is vital and she will closely monitor changes at the body, but she will also "give them some space" to change.
Yesterday, Sir Sandy Crombie, chairman of Creative Scotland, unveiled a series of reforms of the body, including a return to emphasising the role of specialist knowledge in dealing with funding requests.
Ms Hyslop said: "I think trust is a very important thing, it is very precious and it is something you cannot put an economic value on and we have a fantastic cultural and artistic experience here in Scotland.
"This has always been a challenge: How you can have a strategic and flexible cultural organisation but also have the freedom for artists to pursue what they want to do, and I feel very passionately about the independence of artists to do that.
"It is quite clear the operations of Creative Scotland have not delivered that, and I have been quite specific in my request to the board to sort this out."
Ms Hyslop said many of the companies that lost out when Flexible Funding – a fixed-term funding model – was removed have received similar National Lottery support in a recent series of funding decisions.
"I am very passionate about supporting artists in Scotland and will continue to do so, and I am very positive and welcome the responses I have had privately from artists over the actions I have taken," she said.
"I welcome the statement from the board... but the essence of this is that it is so precious, our culture, and we have to make sure it is nurtured and supported."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article