FEMALE asylum seekers who claim to have been raped face discrimination when trying to have their cases heard, a new study has found.
Researchers at the University of Edinburgh who interviewed 100 people who process asylum claims say that rape allegations are not being given the weight they deserve.
According to the report, delays in the process mean women often hold back from reporting rape or sexual violence, leading claims to be disbelieved.
The survey also found a "patchy" awareness of guidelines from UK Border Agency (UKBA) staff and an inconsistent approach towards their application.
Researchers concluded that men who make claims of rape are more likely to be believed than women, while some officials in the asylum process displayed an inclination to treat women's rape claims with suspicion.
Some staff avoided questioning women on rape, while others who took part in the survey were said to have become detached and "case hardened", leading to them to discount claims.
The study also found that interviews were sometimes conducted in an environment that provided limited opportunities for women to disclose incidents of rape.
Dr Sharon Cowan, senior lecturer in Criminal Law at the University of Edinburgh, said preconceived attitudes towards rape claims may affect women's asylum applications.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article