A REFUSAL by an Edinburgh pub to serve a Spanish family has led to an international spat and calls for an inquiry, MSPs will hear this week.
The European Parliament recently contacted Holyrood after the capital's Conan Doyle pub reportedly refused to serve a Spanish girl who gave her national identity card as proof of age.
After the knockback, the girl's father complained to the European Parliament. Italian MEP Erminia Mazzoni, president of its Committee on Petitions, then complained to her Holyrood counterpart.
Mazzoni said: "The managers of the pub should have accepted the identity card issued by Spain as proof of age.
"The members of the Committee on Petitions hope that this is an isolated case of infringement of rights of European citizens."
She then asked for an investigation and help to ensure that EU rules on identity papers are "understood and applied in Scotland".
MSPs on Holyrood's European and External Affairs Committee will discuss the affair on Tuesday.
Under Scottish licensing law, bar staff can be prosecuted for serving someone under 18 unless they have checked their passport, EU photo driving licence or another specified document. However, EU identity cards – despite being accepted at UK border controls instead of passports – are not an acceptable proof of age in Scottish pubs.
It means if staff serve alcohol to someone underage based on a European ID card, they have no defence against prosecution.
Last month, in what the SNP government says was a coincidence, Scottish ministers began consulting on extending the list of proof of age documents to include EU identity cards, and a change in the law is now expected later this year.
A Government spokesman said: "Proof of age is a difficult area for both retailers and customers. The proposals in the consultation recognise this, and propose a way of improving the position for both parties."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article