THE grieving families of the 179 British soldiers killed in the Iraq War deserve "every syllable of the truth" as they try to find closure, a veteran backbencher has said.
Labour MP for Newport West Paul Flynn told the Commons that relatives needed the full facts rather than a censored report containing "suspicions of an establishment cover-up".
His comment came after it emerged only "gists" of conversations between Tony Blair and President Bush, rather than complete transcripts, would be published by the Chilcot Inquiry, which is at least four years late.
He said: "When can we debate the need to find closure to the grieving families of the 179 brave British soldiers killed in the Iraq War?
"They demand the truth, the whole truth and every syllable of the truth and not a censored Chilcot report that will, in John Major's view, contain suspicions that will fester for years, suspicions of an establishment cover-up."
Last month, Sir John said Mr Blair could intervene to allow full disclosure of the exchanges and suggested it would be in his interests to do so.
He said there were "strict rules" that prevented the current government from getting involved and insisted it was down to Labour or Mr Blair to approach the Cabinet Office, which handled the negotiations, to give the go-ahead for the papers to be released.
The former Conservative Prime Minister warned that publishing partial extracts would allow suspicions to "fester and worsen".
He also said withholding the papers would be very embarrassing for Mr Blair given he brought the Freedom of Information Act into law while he was in government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article