Families' incomes have recovered to their strongest levels in at least three years - but the gap between the "haves" and "have nots" is growing - a report has found.
The average monthly income of a UK family reached £2166 in December, marking the highest figure seen since Aviva's regular family finances report started in 2011 and following 18 months of increases.
Family incomes have risen by 12% since January 2011 when the typical family took home £1937 a month.
But families are now separated by a bigger income gap than in January 2011. Three years ago the difference between average monthly incomes of the highest and lowest earning types of family was £1281. That gap has increased by 14% to £1459 in December 2013.
Those with the highest average incomes are couples with plans to have children, who take home £2422 typically. Single parents with one child or more have the lowest typical income at £963.
Researchers found that couples with no plans for children take home £2284 a month on average, couples with one child bring in around £2321 and those with two or more children have £2301 typically. Families' changing fortunes mean that couples with one child have gained the most over the last three years.
Their gains are in stark contrast to divorced, separated or widowed parents who have seen their incomes fall by 14% over the same period, the report found.
Louise Colley, protection distribution director for Aviva, said: "Growing incomes mean some families will be starting the new year in a better financial position than they have become accustomed to.
"But sadly the widening gap between the 'haves' and 'have nots' means this cheery outlook will not be shared by all."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article