Sydney's skyline erupted with fireworks as revellers cheered in the new year from the city's crammed harbour in the world's first major celebration for 2013.
The city's balmy summer night was rocked by seven tons of fireworks fired from roof tops and barges, many cascading from the Sydney Harbour Bridge, in a £4 million pyrotechnic extravaganza billed by organisers as the world's largest. Pop singer Kylie Minogue hosted the event.
In Hong Kong, this year's fireworks display is said to be the biggest ever in the southern Chinese city.
The enthusiastic welcome to the new year continued on a grand scale across Asia. Increasingly democratic Burma held a public countdown for the first time, with Jakarta throwing a huge street party befitting Indonesia's powering economy.
The buoyant economies of the Asia-Pacific partied with renewed optimism despite the so-called fiscal cliff threatening to reverberate globally from the United States and the tattered economies of Europe.
One day after dancing in the snow to celebrate the first anniversary of leader Kim Jong Un's ascension to supreme commander, North Koreans were preparing to celebrate the arrival of the new year, marked as "Juche 102" on North Korean calendars.
Juche means self-reliance, the North Korean ideology of independence promoted by national founder Kim Il Sung, who was born 102 years ago. His grandson now rules North Korea.
Stateside, hundreds of thousands filled Times Square in New York to watch the drop of a Waterford crystal-studded ball.
Major cities across austerity-hit Europe also burned off part of their battered budgets in a string of spectacular fireworks displays, although some places – including the Cypriot capital, Nicosia – cancelled their celebrations in light of the continuing economic crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article