Petrochemical giant Ineos today pledged to give £2.5 billion to Scottish communities that agreed to fracking.
Despite a moratorium on the practice, bosses told a press conference at Grangemouth they believed gas was the key for the future of their business.
They said there was a 'very rapid decline' in North Sea gas and the company was spending £400m in importing shale gas from the U.S.
Chief executive Gary Haywood said they realised there were concerns about fracking in Scottish communities and claimed there was 'misinformation' .
He said the company was today launching a community engagement process so people could find out the facts for themselves.
A series of dates have been set up for meetings in Falkirk, Kilsyth and Cumbernauld next month.
Communications director Tom Crotty said the prime shale areas in the UK were Scotland and north England.
Gary Haywood said they agreed with the Scottish government's 'slow, cautious' approach.
Journalists were told Ineos had already rejected some potential sites due to 'urbanisation or environmental' issues.
It has acquired licences for two sites - pedl 162 and 163. One 127 square mile area covers shotts, Kirkintilloch and Bishopbriggs.
Mary Church, Head of Campaigns for Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "Fracking is a dangerous, dirty industry and all the money in the world can't hide that. No amount of slick roadshows are going to allay the concerns of communities who have heard about the reality of the impacts of this industry in the USA and Australia. No amount of PR spin can hide the climate change impact of exploiting shale gas.
"Scottish communities have been fighting the unconventional gas industry for years, and are already very well informed. It's no surprise that Ineos are resorting to spin-doctors and glossy videos to try and lovebomb Scottish communities into stop worrying and learn to love fracking. Sadly Ineos have the budget for a long and dirty fight, while community and campaign groups can only fight their corner on a shoestring.
"Ineos's pie-in-the-sky claims of huge sums of money for communities will never be delivered. Using the questionable economics of the USA industry to woo communities when we know UK costs will be much higher is simply indefensible. The company is on record saying that if they frack and don't get enough gas, then communities won't get a penny.
"The figures the company is using are also based on highly uncertain and exaggerated estimates of how much gas it might be possible to extract from UK shale beds.
"We are convinced that when Scotland has thoroughly reviewed the evidence around health and climate impacts of unconventional gas the moratorium will swiftly become a permanent ban, just like in New York State. Ineos is pouring its money down the drain trying to sell fracking in Scotland when it's never going to happen anyway.
"Communities will be looking at Ineos's poor record at Grangemouth when they judge for themselves the trustworthiness of the company's claims that fracking is safe."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article