The UK Government has backed down over plans to force colleges and universities to provide details of the content of speeches under anti-terrorism plans.
The proposed laws would have seen an outline of the topics to be covered given to the authorities. They had been branded Orwellian, draconian and repressive, whilst threatening freedom of speech, by the Muslim community and Scottish universities.
Home Secretary Theresa May has amended the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill to ensure the duty of universities and colleges protect their students from the risk of being radicalised would no longer require advanced notice from speakers.
The changes emerged as MPs discussed amendments made by peers to the Bill. They were passed unopposed.
Ms May added changes also made "absolutely clear" the duty of universities and higher education institutions under the Government's counter-terrorism Prevent strategy would not override "academic freedom".
Labour also welcomed the need for a judge to examine requests by the Home Secretary to block the return of British terror suspects with temporary exclusion orders, as part of attempts to return them to the UK in a "managed" way, as a "significant U-turn".
Liberal Democrat former minister David Heath said he did not want over-bureaucratic guidance for universities.
The Somerset MP said: "If I had to tell a university that I was speaking at what I was going to say two weeks in advance, I'd be quite incapable of doing so because I don't know what I'm going to say at the moment I stand up to make a speech rather than two weeks in advance."
Labour Muslim MP Yasmin Qureshi claimed the Government was inching Britain towards a "McCarthyite" state where people spy on each other by planning to put preventative measures on to a statutory footing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article