Keith Brown's announcement on new funds for cycling is welcome indeed.
Cycling should be at the top of every government investment list – it is just common sense as it ticks so many policy boxes.
Getting more people cycling takes traffic off the roads so we have less congestion and less pollution, it helps to stimulate local shopping areas as opposed to car dependent out-of-town stores and will help to make our population healthier.
This last bonus, above all others, should have politicians falling over themselves to invest in more safe cycling facilities. Our health record is shocking indeed, and the cost to the NHS will only increase with time. Cross-cutting policy initiatives such as promoting walking and cycling are far more effective than ever more drugs and hospital treatment for the many conditions brought on by lack of exercise.
There is no reason why Scotland should not enjoy the levels of cycling that are typical of many other northern European countries – our climate is much the same as theirs, as is our topography.
If the Scottish Government is serious about 10% of journeys being by bike, then this new investment must be just the start of a concerted national strategy to create a network of safe and convenient routes linking all our communities.
Currently only around 1% of the transport budget is spent on cycling. We will not seriously improve matters if we continue to invest such a small amount in cycling while pouring billions into new road schemes.
In contrast to big road projects, where the contracts tend to go to overseas firms, the creation of new cycle routes creates local jobs – just what we need at the present time.
New routes in rural areas are certainly welcome and will help to boost tourism, but what must now follow is a major programme for urban areas where most of Scotland's population lives – and where safe cycle routes are so desperately needed.
Paul Tetlaw is a board member of Transform Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article