RANGERS' administrators Duff & Phelps plan to release full details of the Charles Green consortium's takeover plans today and ask creditors to vote it through.
The proposal being put to those who are owed money by Rangers is to accept a specified pence-in-the-pound return and allow the club to come out of administration via a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA).
Creditors will be invited to vote for that at a meeting, probably held at Ibrox, 16 days after the proposal goes out. There would then be a 28-day "cooling off" period before the CVA would be formally approved.
Duff & Phelps has come under heavy criticism, with a BBC Scotland documentary alleging a conflict of interest because senior partner David Grier had acted as a consultant to owner Craig Whyte during the takeover.
The programme claimed Mr Grier worked on the deal to fund Whyte's takeover using money raised from selling season-ticket rights to Ticketus. Mr Grier denies that and said he believed money from Ticketus would be used to provide some working capital, but not to fund Whyte's entire buyout. "I don't think I would have any problem with a full investigation of the process," joint-administrator Paul Clark told The Herald, but he said the immediate priority was to work on a CVA.
The CVA proposals were due to be released on Monday but, barring any late hitches, they will come out on the club's official website today. "We're almost there now, albeit a bit later than everyone had hoped," said Mr Clark. "They are going to be substantial documents and when they are issued and made available publicly I'm sure there will be a lot of interest in what Charles Green has to say."
Mr Green's consortium proposes a £8.5 million takeover. Mr Clark said he had been shown proof of funds for both the buyout and Rangers' running costs until a CVA is approved. They will become heavily loss-making again from June 1 when the players' temporary pay cuts end. The earliest the club could come out of administration would be around July 9.
Mr Clark claimed that two main creditors who could block a CVA, Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Ticketus, had given him encouraging feedback.
"We have had regular dialogue with both parties and we have shared with them the outcomes based on CVA and other processes and we remain confident we will be able to get the requisite approval for the CVA, because we think it is in the best interests for Rangers," he said.
"This would be a straightforward CVA so we're not embarking on that without thinking that we can deliver it. We have found a buyer and the bid is progressing towards its conclusion."
Whyte's floating charge over Ibrox and Murray Park had been rendered irrelevant by the deal he had signed with Mr Green, said Mr Clark.
He added: "My understanding is that as part of the documentation between Mr Whyte and Mr Green the floating charge – such that it could have any value – will fall away. It will have no value. He could sit there with a floating charge registered at Companies House, but it has no value because he didn't actually pay any money into the bank or the company to acquire any value."
That meant Whyte could not block a CVA, said Mr Clark.
However, the accusations against Mr Grier, and the delays and confusion in finding a buyer for Rangers, appeared to have turned many against Duff & Phelps. "Virtually every fan is unhappy with their performance," said John Macmillan of Rangers Supporters' Association. "I think Duff & Phelps' handling of this administration has been a shambles."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article