David Cameron's most senior civil servant has rejected Labour calls for an inquiry into alleged breaches of the ministerial code by the Prime Minister as a result of his links to Conservative elections adviser Lynton Crosby.
Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood said that, as Mr Crosby was employed by the Conservative Party and does not "advise or lobby on Government business", he could see no purpose in an investigation.
In a letter to Labour leader Ed Miliband, Sir Jeremy revealed that the Australian lobbyist had agreed "principles of engagement" with the party when he took up his advisory role, pledging "not to use access to ministers or special advisers to influence or lobby for changes in Government policy on behalf of his firm's clients".
Mr Crosby, whose lobbying firm CTF Partners is reported to have worked for tobacco giant Philip Morris, denied he had had talks with Mr Cameron on the subject of plain packaging of cigarettes.
His denial follows a string of stories about whether his advice to Mr Cameron was influenced by his company's work for firms involved in the smoking and alcohol industry, private healthcare and shale gas "fracking".
Mr Miliband accused Mr Cameron of "bringing big tobacco to the heart of Downing Street" by hiring Mr Crosby shortly before shelving plans for standardised cigarette packages.
But in a statement issued yesterday by CTF Partners, Mr Crosby said: "The Prime Minister has repeatedly and clearly said that I have never lobbied him on anything, including on the issue of tobacco or plain packaging of cigarettes.
"What the PM said should be enough for any ordinary person but to avoid any doubt or speculation, let me be clear: at no time have I had any conversation or discussion with or lobbied the Prime Minister, or indeed the health secretary or the health minister, on plain packaging or tobacco issues.
"Indeed, any claim I have sought to improperly use my position as part-time campaign adviser to the Conservative Party is simply false."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article