Top-selling novelist John Grisham says people who look at child pornography "probably had too much to drink" and should be given lighter prison sentences.
Grisham, 59, criticised the length of imprisonment imposed on offenders who download images of children being sexually abused.
He also revealed that one of his "good buddies" had been caught in a child porn sting.
The writer made the controversial comments during an interview in which he blasted the American justice system and high number of serving convicts.
"We have prisons now filled with guys my age. Sixty-year-old white men in prison who've never harmed anybody, would never touch a child," he told the Telegraph.
"But they got online one night and started surfing around, probably had too much to drink or whatever, and pushed the wrong buttons, went too far and got into child porn."
Grisham said "too many people" are being locked up for crimes such as minor drugs charges, child porn offences and white collar crime.
He added that America's judges had "gone crazy" during the last 30 years.
The author of legal thrillers such as The Firm and A Time To Kill, who has sold more than 275 million books during his 25-year career, added that his "good buddy from law school" was jailed for three years for viewing child porn in Canada.
He said the site was labelled "sixteen-year-old wannabe hookers" and that his friend's drinking was "out of control" at the time.
Grisham said America has "gone nuts" on incarceration and criticised the number of people who are prosecuted as sex offenders.
He added: "I have no sympathy for real paedophiles. God, please lock those people up. But so many of these guys do not deserve harsh prison sentences, and that's what they're getting."
Asked about the fact that viewing child porn fuels abuse of youngsters to create the images, Grisham replied that sentences should still be lower for people who only download the content.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article