THE youngest victim of the Boston Marathon bombings had been waiting to give his father a hug at the finish when he was killed by one of the blasts.
Martin Richard, eight, from Dorchester, a neighbourhood of Boston, was among at least three people killed in the blasts that erupted near the finish line.
A makeshift memorial of flowers and a wish for "Peace" written in chalk were outside Martin's home yesterday.
Drivers slowed down as they approached it, paused, and made the sign of the cross before moving on.
The boy reportedly may have nearly cheated death after walking out to embrace his father as he went to cross the finishing line. But when Mr Richard walked on, the youngster turned back to rejoin his mother as the bomb exploded.
In a tragic twist, the boy appears in a Facebook picture holding the sign: "No more hurting people. Peace."
Martin's sister Jane has reportedly lost a leg and his mother Denise is understood to have undergone surgery for a serious head injury. They are among the 170 who were injured in the attack.
His older brother, 12-year-old Henry, is not thought to have been hurt in the explosion.
Martin's father Bill told the world of son's death in a statement.
It read: "My dear son Martin has died from injuries sustained in the attack on Boston.
"My wife and daughter are both recovering from serious injuries.
"We thank our family and friends, those we know and those we have never met, for their thoughts and prayers. I ask that you continue to pray for my family as we remember Martin."
Meanwhile, the second of the three victims has been named as restaurant manageress Krystle Campbell, 29, from Medford, Massachusetts. Her father, William, said Ms Campbell had gone with her best friend – who was seriously injured in the blast – to take a picture of the woman's boyfriend crossing the finish line.
Mr Campbell said she was a "very caring, very loving person, and was daddy's little girl".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article