THE residents of a Scottish town would have been left to die horribly had the Cold War gone hot, government papers reveal.
The files single out Kirkcaldy, Fife, as the one place in the UK which would not have been able to provide sufficient protection from a Soviet onslaught.
Ironically, the community of 50,000, is just 30 miles from one of the country's network of underground nuclear bunkers.
However, a Home Office report from 1961, that was kept secret for decades, makes a remarkable reference to the town.
The papers assess British communities for their ability to withstand nuclear attack, based on the Protection Factor (PF).
Buildings had to be assessed with a PF of 150 or higher to provide acceptable protection.
A single paragraph identifies the Fife community as the only place in the land whose citizens could not be given proper protection.
It states: "It will be seen that in all the county boroughs, boroughs (except Kirkcaldy) and urban districts there would be little difficulty in accommodating the people whose dwellings had a minimal PF of ten or less in communal refuges with a PF of 150 or more."
The report makes no further reference to what steps - if any - would have been taken to care for residents, who at the time it was written included then 10-year-olds Gordon Brown and Jack Vettriano.
Their home town was a potential target because it lies just 11 miles away from the Royal Naval dockyard at Rosyth.
Just 10 years before the report, the government constructed a giant underground bunker around 30 miles away near St Andrews.
The bunker - now a tourist attraction - is 150ft below ground and would have saved the lives of 300 top officials, MoD personnel and ministers while the residents of Kirkcaldy perished.
The document spells out that the death rate would have been high even among civilians who made it to proper shelters.
"Instead of nearly one and a half million of the bungalow and prefab dwellers receiving a sickness or lethal dose (of radiation), only some 51,000 would be sick or die if they were moved to communal refuges.
"The savings would not be as spectacular as suggested since many of the people who were saved from becoming fall-out casualties would be killed, in any case, by blast. It seems probable that at least half the casualties saved from fall-out would also survive the effects of blast.
"Moving two and a half million people from bungalows and prefabs into refuges should reduce casualties by over half a million."
Labour councillor David Ross, the leader of Fife Council said: "I can't shed any light on why Kirkcaldy might have been left out of these plans.
"The area was renowned for its coal mines and perhaps they expected people to take shelter in them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article