LABOUR will today call for a fundamental overhaul of the test which determines whether or not a person is eligible for sickness benefits.
The Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Liam Byrne will launch a consultation in Glasgow with dis-ability campaigners, and will not defend the Work Capabil- ity Assessment (WCA).
It was introduced by the last Labour Government, but Mr Byrne will also admit it is not working. "We have to be brave enough to say that even with initiatives we produced they are not working, we need to change them," he said.
Mr Byrne explained experience had shown the test did not help disabled people but rather set red tape against them. He said that while Atos, the private IT contractor initially brought in to carry out the test, had questions to answer, the focus of Labour's criticism was the UK Government's mismanagement of the scheme. Since WCA was introduced, there have been more than 600,000 appeals, costing £60 million a year.
The Department for Work and Pensions last night said the WCA had been reviewed and refined so people were given a "more tailored and personal service" and there had been "an increase in the number of severely disabled people being given long-term unconditional support".
Carolyn Roberts, head of policy and campaigns at SAMH (the Scottish Association for Mental Health), said: "Generally speaking, work is good for your mental health, so we support efforts to help people get back into work. But we are worried the WCA doesn't properly assess mental health and is finding people fit for work when they are not."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article