BROADCASTING a public inquiry into the death of spy Alexander Litvinenko could lead to witnesses not attending because of fears of "reprisal or revenge" from Russia, police have said.
A lawyer representing the Metropolitan Police Service told inquiry chairman Sir Robert Owen that it would be "wrong and unfair that witnesses should be avoidably subjected to fears arising from the giving of evidence".
The inquiry into the death of Mr Litvinenko, who was poisoned in a London hotel, is due to start on January 27.
One of the decisions Sir Robert has to make before it begins is whether proceedings should be broadcast live on the internet, as was done during the Leveson Inquiry into culture, practices and ethics of the press.
Urging Sir Robert to rule that the inquiry should not be broadcast, Richard Horwell, QC, submitted that there were "compelling" reasons for such a decision.
Speaking at a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, he said: "We have a fundamental objection to the broadcast of these proceedings because we believe there is a risk it will discourage co-operation and cause some witnesses not to attend, particularly those out of the jurisdiction."
Mr Horwell told Sir Robert: "This was a highly organised and shocking execution and you have found that there is prima facie evidence of Russian State involvement. That is what the witnesses will no doubt have in mind when approaching this inquiry."
He said: "Subjective fears are relevant, however mis-placed they may be, and as world events unfold no-one could suggest that it is fanciful for a witness in this of all hearings to be concerned about reprisal or revenge from Russia."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article