A man who was injured in the grounds of a stately home after taking his grandson on a bat walk told a nurse he had been stupid to have taken the route he did, a court heard.
John Cowan told the nurse he had been wanting to get the child home because he was tired, it was claimed.
Mr Cowan, 65, a former water quality manager, suffered a fractured ankle and underwent a series of operations following the incident at Hopetoun House, on the outskirts of Edinburgh, on September 5, 2008.
He said he "stepped off" a ha-ha – a sunken feature which can be found on country estates – as he made his way back to the car park with his five-year-old grandson Ross.
Carol Terry, 41, a sister with the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, who also runs a bat hospital in her spare time, had also been at the event in the grounds of the house and went to help after the incident.
Mrs Terry said: "He said that he could not believe he had been that stupid when he had been told not to walk that way.
"He had reached the ha-ha and knew it was there and could have walked round.
Mr Cowan wanted to get the child home because he was tired and jumped from the ha-ha, the witness said.
Mrs Terry added: "He said he did not think it was as high as it was."
Mr Cowan raised an action suing the Hopetoun House Preservation Trust and its trustees, including the Marquess of Linlithgow and Lord Hopetoun at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Damages in the compensation claim have been agreed at £35,000, with liability contested.
In the action it is claimed they became disorientated in the darkness.
He said it was pitch black at the point where he went into the ha-ha and thought there was a lawn and path in front of him.
The judge, Lord Bracadale, will give a decision in the case later.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article