Cyclists who suffered broken bones and ligament damage after slipping on Edinburgh's tram tracks are taking legal action against the city council.
Up to 60 bikers who received breaks, sprains and fractures after accidents around the city's transport system are taking legal action following their injuries.
Thompsons solicitors say the design of tram lines and warning signs amount to negligence by city transport authorities.
If claimants are successful, the council could be forced to pay out up to £10,000 for each individual case, leading to a potential bill of more than £500,000.
The first test case is due to heard at the Court of Session within months.
A third of cyclists making claims sustained fractures or breaks in falls -- three with broken collarbones and three with broken wrists.
One biker suffered broken toes after being run over by a bus. The rest received cuts, bruises, sprains or ligament damage.
Stewart White, an associate dealing with accident claims Thomson Solicitors, said: "We're confident of proceeding and that a successful judgement will pave the way for settling the remainder.
"The council have repudiated liability in every case. The position has been that the tram tracks are there to be seen, and that's it.
"That's simply not good enough. The bottom line is that they have removed cycling provision and they have replaced it with the tram system, which is essentially a railway through the city centre.
"What's a cyclist supposed to do in that environment?"
Mr White accused the council of not keeping the roads safe for all users.
He added: "They've done very little to accommodate cyclists. I think cyclists have been pretty far down the chain when they've been considering health and safety."
Councillor Lesley Hinds, Edinburgh's transport convener, said the council could not comment on pending legal cases.
But she added: "In terms of cycling, the council advises anyone cycling near to and around the tram tracks should take care while they get used to them, especially in wet weather conditions as the tracks will be slippery."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article