MPs have urged the Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds to remove restrictions on customers with basic bank accounts using cash machines run by other banks.
The Treasury Select Committee said restricting access to cash machines could compromise the network and affect the most vulnerable people in society.
Barclays, HSBC and Santander have all pledged to continue to provide basic bank account holders with unrestricted access to cash machines, but now MPs will ask other providers to do so.
About 8.4 million basic bank accounts are used by people who do not necessarily meet banks' minimum criteria to open a personal current account, possibly due to a poor credit history. They often do not offer a debit card or an overdraft, but access to
such accounts can help lower-income households to manage their money and access other finance products.
RBS and Lloyds currently limit access to cash machines for their basic account holders, with different restrictions applying to basic accounts with Lloyds TSB, Halifax and Bank of Scotland arms of Lloyds Banking Group.
RBS last year said bank account customers would no longer be able to use cash machines run by other banks or independent third parties.
Some similar restrictions apply to customers with a Lloyds TSB basic bank accounts.
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said: "The committee understands the need for banks to control costs, particularly in these difficult times.
"In this instance, the financial benefits to Lloyds and RBS appear relatively small but those affected would be among the most vulnerable people in society."
Meanwhile, banks, building societies and credit unions must have stickers or posters in branch windows publicising the compensation scheme, along with a sticker at the cashier's window or desk, a poster in a highly visible position inside and information on their websites, according to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article