SIX out of 10 MSPs believe Scotland is failing in its efforts to curb the impact of illegal drug use .
A poll published today, the first of its kind carried out among politicians north of the Border, reveals that just 35% of MSPs believe policies on illegal drugs are effective.
Just over half – 57% – agree that the topic is so controversial it can be difficult to have an objective debate about the issue.
While most MSPs surveyed – 70% – thought policies should make more use of evidence and research, they were largely not in favour of exploring the possibility of making radical changes to drug policy.
Only about one-quarter – 27% – agreed consideration should be given to decriminalising the possession of small quantities of drugs for personal use, with 51% against this idea.
The survey, carried out by the UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC), an independent body that aims to objectively analyse drug policies, was based on the anonymous responses of 55 out of 129 MSPs and was weighted to reflect the political composition of Holyrood.
The poll was carried out before the publication of figures last month that showed drug-related deaths have reached a record level in Scotland.
Last year there were 584 north of the Border, the highest ever recorded and up 20% on the previous year. It is estimated there are more than 50,000 Scots drugs addicts, with the economic and social cost adding up to £2.6 billion per year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article