Network Rail (NR), under-fire over level crossing safety, is to reduce the bonuses that can be earned by its top directors.
But under the proposed new bonus regime, NR's bosses could still get deferred annual bonuses totalling 20% of salary.
This means that if performance targets are met, NR chief executive Mark Carne who is on £675,000 a year, could get an annual bonus of up to £135,000.
To be voted on at NR's annual meeting in July the new bonus scheme ends the existing scheme. That saw top executives not only eligible for a performance-related annual bonus worth up to 60% of salary, but also a three-year rolling bonus worth up to 100% of salary.
In January this year, the subject of NR bonuses was raised in a Court of Appeal judgment which saw NR lose its appeal over a £150,000 fine after a 2010 level crossing incident at Beccles in Norfolk in which a 10-year-old boy suffered life-changing injuries.
In March this year, the House of Commons Transport Committee, in a report on level crossing safety which was highly critical of NR, said: "Given that Network Rail has recently been held responsible for the serious accident at Beccles we would be very concerned if its remuneration committee awarded bonuses to executive directors this year. "
In addition, NR may have felt that it was under more pressure over bonuses due to a change of accounting procedures which means the company's net debt of around £30bn, already guaranteed by the government, will be officially on the government's balance sheet from September this year — adding to the national debt.
The proposed new bonus structure, to cover the five-year period starting April 2014, covers not only Mr Carne, but also NR group finance director Patrick Butcher, network operations managing director Robin Gisby and route strategy director Paul Plummer. To get the new bonus, they will have to beat targets in areas such as safety, punctuality and passenger satisfaction
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article