A TROUBLED NHS phone line for non-emergency cases south of the Border has seen one of its main providers pull out over financial problems.
NHS Direct, which operates the 111 line in nine regions covering a third of England's population, said it was "seeking to withdraw from the contracts it entered into".
A spokeswoman said the contracts were financially unsustainable.
While officials have promised patients who live in affected areas will "continue to receive a prompt and safe service", health unions warned some parts of the service were "in chaos".
The 111 service has been riddled with controversy since its inception from April 1. The line suffered many teething problems, with patients complaining of calls going unanswered, poor advice given and calls being diverted to the wrong part of the country.
Just a month after its launch, leading medics warned the roll-out of the system left many patients not knowing where to turn.
NHS England launched an investigation into the advice line after a number of potentially serious incidents, including three deaths, were linked to the service.
NHS Direct originally won 11 of the 46 contracts for the 111 line across England.
It previously announced it would be unable to provide the service in North Essex and Cornwall, but now it is also planning to stop providing the service in a number of other areas after projecting a £26 million deficit for the coming financial year.
Chief executive Nick Chapman said: "We will continue to provide a safe and reliable NHS 111 service until alternative arrangements can be made."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article