Chancellor George Osborne's deficit-busting plans were dealt a blow today as the last borrowing figures to be published before his Autumn Statement revealed further pressure on the public finances.
Public sector net borrowing, excluding financial interventions such as bank bailouts, was £8.6 billion in October, up £2.7 billion on the same month last year.
The Chancellor wants to record borrowing for the full year 2012/2013 of £120 billion, compared with £121.4 billion in the previous year, but this is looking increasingly unlikely.
Mr Osborne is now widely expected to announce in his Autumn Statement in December that the Government will be unable to start bringing down debt as a percentage of GDP in 2015/16.
The chances of the Chancellor altering the debt target were heightened after Bank of England governor Sir Mervyn King effectively endorsed such a move, on condition that the global economy was growing slowly.
If Mr Osborne sticks to the debt target, he will be faced with the unpopular decision of announcing potentially large tax rises and further spending cuts in December.
Public sector borrowing for the year to date is £73.3 billion, excluding a one-off £28 billion boost from the transfer of the Royal Mail pension fund into Treasury ownership, which is £5 billion higher than the same period last year.
Within the October figures, the picture was much the same as previous months, with Government spending outstripping tax receipts.
Total tax receipts were 1.8% higher at £47.5 billion in October, while total expenditure rose 7.4% to £52.8 billion.
Tax revenues were dragged down by a drop in corporation tax, which fell 9.5% to £8.1 billion, while spending on social benefits, such as state pensions, jumped 7.7% to £16 billion.
Public sector net debt was £1.1 trillion at the end of October, equal to 67.9% of gross domestic product (GDP), compared with £971 billion or 63.4% of GDP last year.
A Treasury spokesman said: "The economy is healing, but it still faces many challenges. These numbers illustrate that, but also show the Government's plans to bring spending under control are on track for the year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article