No action will be taken over a Private Eye cover featuring Rebekah Brooks that a judge deemed "a joke in especially bad taste".
A spokesman for the Attorney General confirmed that the front of the magazine's November edition, published as Mrs Brooks's trial started at the Old Bailey, would not lead to contempt of court proceedings.
He said: "The front cover of the current edition of Private Eye has been brought to the attention of the Attorney General, but it has been decided that proceedings for a potential contempt of court are not required in this case."
Former News International chief executive Brooks is facing trial along with seven other defendants including ex-Number 10 spin doctor Andy Coulson.
Mr Justice Saunders told the nine women and three men of the jury: "Unfortunately Private Eye has seen fit today to put out their November edition. You will undoubtedly see it on the newstands, so I can show it to you.
"It bears a picture of Rebekah Brooks on the cover. It's meant to be satire. You ignore it. It has no serious input and it is not relevant to your considerations. It is one of those things that you will have to ignore - a joke which in the circumstances of today is a joke in especially bad taste."
The cover featured a photograph of Brooks under the headline Halloween Special, with Horror Witch Costume Withdrawn from Shops under the picture.
Mrs Brooks, 45, of Oxfordshire, and Mr Coulson, 45, from Kent, are both accused of conspiracy to intercept communications. They are accused of conspiring with former News of the World staff and others to illegally access voicemails.
Mrs Brooks also faces charges of conspiring to commit misconduct in public office and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Mr Coulson is also facing two allegations he conspired with the tabloid's ex-royal editor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article