GEORGE Osborne effectively announced yesterday the Royal Bank of Scotland's days as a global investment banking giant were over, suggesting the risk to the taxpayer was too great.
The Chancellor told the bank it should shed "significant" parts of its risky so-called "casino" arm and focus instead on its UK customers.
The move appeared to signal the end of a dramatic period in RBS's history, in which it has grown to become an international behemoth and triggered the world's biggest bailout, all in the space of a decade.
Last night Mr Osborne's comments led to renewed fears that around 5000 jobs could be lost if RBS sells off much of its investment business.
Making the announcement, the Chancellor told MPs the Government's stake in RBS was now worth £27 billion less than when the stricken bank was rescued in 2008.
To prevent British taxpayers being responsible for another bailout, the bank had already scaled back its investment arm, Mr Osborne said. However, he added: "RBS needs to go further and the management agrees."
He told MPs he believed RBS's future was as a major UK bank with the majority of its business in the UK, servicing the personal and business sectors.
The change would make RBS "stronger and safer", he said, and could eventually lead to it being sold, although he did not say if taxpayers could expect to recoup all their money.
Critics warned the bank would be forced to sell its investment arm at a loss, cutting the chances of taxpayers recouping their losses.
Stewart Hosie, the SNP MP and member of the Treasury Select Committee, also called on Mr Osborne to be clear about what size of a reduction in the investment business he expected.
"This uncertainty is damaging for RBS and all of those who work for it," he said.
RBS said last night it was already pushing ahead with plans to sell off much of its investment banking side.
The bank also confirmed it did not expect it would have to sell off its US-based Citizens Financial.
However, sources at the bank conceded it was not the best time to be selling assets in the global marketplace.
The fall of RBS was one of the biggest corporate collapses in history. The British Government bailed the bank out to the tune of £45bn in 2008, following other cash injections from the Bank of England.
The UK taxpayer still owns more than 80% of the bank, but its stake is worth £27bn less than it was three years ago, the Chancellor said.
RBS has already significantly shrunk its investment interests.
In 2007 that arm of the business had assets of around £870bn, but these have now shrunk to £400bn.
Last night there were fears over the number of jobs that could be lost. Around 18,900 people are employed by RBS's investment business, and experts suggest about 5000 of these post could be axed.
Last night a spokesman for the bank said the majority of RBS's business was already within the UK.
He added: "RBS confirmed last month we would adjust the size of our investment bank in line with changing market conditions.
"We will give an update on final decisions in the new year following consultation with our major shareholders."
A long-awaited Financial Services Authority report published earlier this month said RBS was brought to its knees by "multiple poor decisions" and its "gamble" on buying Dutch bank ABN Amro.
It blamed deficiencies in the management and culture at RBS prior to its £45bn bailout and called for tougher rules to make bankers more accountable for their actions.
Last night, Liberal Democrat MP Stephen Williams said the Coalition had done the right thing and had acted swiftly, but he urged the Government to use its ownership of RBS to create a new bank to increase competition in the market.
Scottish Government Finance Secretary John Swinney said: "The UK Government must not create more uncertainty for the thousands of Scots who directly or indirectly rely on employment by RBS. The UK Government must provide clarity on its support for a substantial, standalone and international banking group properly headquartered in Scotland, with all the employment and wider economic benefits that entails. As RBS runs down elements of its London investment banking operation, we will of course support the movement of back and front-office jobs to Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article