THE younger generation will be worse off under state pension reforms, a report has warned.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) found women approaching retirement and the self-employed would be the major winners from the introduction of a single-tier state pension from 2016.
But for those born after the mid-1980s, the reforms spelled a less generous state pension income for almost everyone apart from the long-term self-employed. The existing two-part state pension system will be replaced by a new simplified state pension to be set at around £146 a week, which researchers said would restore the same level of generosity relative to average earnings in the early 1970s.
The biggest gainers will be those who have spent long periods out of work or doing low-paid work, and the long-term self-employed.
Women will typically gain £5.23 per week, compared to £1.62 for men. Those with more than 10 years in self-employment will gain £7.51 per week on average, compared to £2.19 among those who have never worked for themselves.
But, for the next generation, the reforms represent a reduction in income.
The report says someone who was born in 1986, who spends 35 years as a low earner, would receive nearly £1000 per year less under the proposed new system than under the current one. This could be nearly £2300 per year for a high earner of the same age.
Co-author, Soumaya Keynes, said: "The single-tier pension will boost the state pension entitlements of some of those who are close to state pension age, or the long-term self-employed.
"But, for most in their 20s and 30s, despite making it easier to predict how much they will get, the reforms will reduce their state pension income.
"They will need to save more privately for their retirement."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article