A pharmacist who made a series of crude remarks to three colleagues has been let off with a warning because he came from a "restrictive" Muslim background.
Khalil Jamil asked one of the women about her favourite sexual position and quizzed another about the mating habits of her horses.
The General Pharmaceutical Council panel found Mr Jamil acted inappropriately by making the comments and standing too close to his assistants – but ruled his behaviour was not sexually motivated.
They accepted he was not used to working in such an open environment with women as he came from a strict Muslim community, and had remedied his actions by attending a "dignity at work" course.
As the remarks were not sexually motivated the panel cleared Mr Jamil of misconduct and gave him an official warning.
Panel chairman Patrick Malmo, QC, said: "He felt the source of this behaviour in 2009 was that he comes from a very restrictive background, with little social life, and none at all outside of his own community.
"He lacked social skills, and had little knowledge of how one should be when working with colleagues. He was unable to distinguish between friendliness and over-familiarity."
Mr Malmo added: 'We do not think there is a serious risk of this kind of conduct being repeated. Although we do not find the registrant impaired, we have the ability to issue a warning, and given the circumstances of this case, we believe it is necessary to do so."
In a statement read to the hearing, one of Mr Jamil's colleagues, referred to as CH, said she was working with him at the Co-operative Pharmacy in Fauldhouse, West Lothian, on July 18, 2009, when he asked: "Do you have a boyfriend? Do you want a boyfriend?' She said: "Whenever it went quiet he came back to me and stood close again. He asked me if I was into sports, I said 'No'.
"He said he was into boxing and said feel my stomach. He grabbed my wrist and tried to get me to touch his stomach."
Jamil had told the hearing he had no desire to be in a relationship with the woman, saying: "I suppose I was showing off, at the time, that I train, I work hard," he replied.
He made similar remarks to another assistant, referred to only as SS, while he was working as a locum at a Morrisons pharmacy in St Andrews, Fife, in November 2009. The pharmacist approached her while she was at a computer and asked her if she had a boyfriend and how she liked to have sex with him.
A similar incident occurred the following week, in which he put his arms around her waist.
A third woman, known as SR, was working at the same pharmacy when Mr Jamil stood so close to her that as she bent down to pick up some prescriptions, she could not help but back into him.
She added that he had asked if getting her horses castrated had affected the animals' sex drives, and whether it would have the same effect on a man.
He had admitted that all the incidents took place but denied any possible sexual motivation.
Speaking afterwards, Graham Edwards said on behalf of Mr Jamil: 'I think the panel's decision was overall correct.
"Although Mr Jamil had not acted with sexual motivation, and although he had crossed professional boundaries, it is clear that through his insight and his remedial actions and courses followed, the correct decision has been made to assess that he is not impaired.
"It is correct that the panel warned him about his future behaviour.
"The duration of the inquiry into these matters, being three years, has caused Mr Jamil and his family to be emotionally damaged, at a great deal of financial cost."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article