The Treasury has insisted it would dispose of its stake in Royal Bank of Scotland "at the right time and in the interests of the taxpayer" amid reports a pre-election share giveaway was under serious consideration.
Scandal-hit RBS - which is 81% state-owned after a £45 billion bailout in 2008 - could be ready for privatisation this year, but at present prices that would mean a huge public loss.
The Liberal Democrats have championed the idea of a share giveaway and it was reported today that Conservative ministers were also now examining the idea of handing it back to taxpayers.
Party sources told the Independent and Daily Mail that Chancellor George Osborne saw continued ownership as politically "untenable" amid Libor-fixing and other scandals and was keen to end the state's role soon.
They told the newspapers Economic Secretary to the Treasury Sajid Javid had been tasked with drawing up options and that giving everyone in the country shares worth £300-£400 would be a vote winner and stimulate the economy.
"One of the options of course could be to put it in our manifesto - but then Labour could do that as well," they were quoted as saying.
"Wouldn't it be much better if voters were getting a cheque for £400 a few months before election day? It would also be a very big stimulus."
Short of a giveaway, some shares could be offered to the public at a discount.
The Treasury insisted that no decisions had been taken and that its aim remained to return RBS to the private sector "at the appropriate moment" and with the best possible outcome for the taxpayer.
Business Secretary Vince Cable said earlier this month that while there was "no immediate prospect" of a giveaway, "my party has advocated that option and we want to keep that option alive".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article