SERIOUS doubts have been cast over planned new controls of air guns after Scotland's most senior frontline officers warned licensing would be too expensive and unwieldy.
The move is likely to cause embarrassment, coming days after the Scottish Government announced new laws to license air weapons as part of its last programme of legislation before the 2014 independence referendum.
The licensing of air weapons was a key part of the SNP's manifesto and for years focused tension between Westminster and Holyrood because it was an area reserved to the UK Government.
The Calman Commission recommended that powers on air weapons be devolved to Scotland and this was taken forward through the Scotland Act 2012 at Westminster.
However, the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (ASPS) has now asked the Scottish Government to reconsider the plan to license all air guns north of the border, partly because there are so many in Scotland that the additional cost and burden on police would be considerable at a time of shrinking budgets. They also point out most owners are law abiding.
While Scotland's 50,000 firearms are already licensed under UK-wide legislation, the 500,000 air weapons in circulation are not.
The campaign to tighten air gun controls gathered momentum after the death of two-year-old Andrew Morton in Glasgow in 2005, who was shot in the head with an airgun pellet by a drug addict.
A paper from ASPS states: "The scale of the challenge around licensing and ongoing enforcement of any new legislation must not be underestimated. The costs of undertaking this must be made as clear as possible.
"There will be costs to businesses involved in supplying air weapons and associated products, to the public owning air weapons in complying with any legislation around licensing, costs to policing for operating the licensing process and enforcing the legislation and costs to the courts systems for dealing with any breaches of the legislation.
"While ASPS support the principle behind the drive for legislation - criminal use of air weapons is unacceptable and improved control may assist with prevention and lead to fewer victims of crime - it is the practical issues that give cause for concern. The challenges around getting any licensing of air weapons right are varied and complex.
"In the face of reducing policing budgets will it be possible for policing to absorb the costs of operating an air weapons licensing process and enforcing new laws?"
The number of offences in Scotland involving firearms has more than halved in the past five years, with roughly a third of offences relating to air weapons.
Chief Superintendent David O'Connor, president of ASPS, said: "Air weapons are very popular in Scotland. Most are used responsibly by law abiding people. Any legislation brought forward will be challenging from a cost and enforcement point of view.
"It is important that any air weapon licensing legislation is subject to robust scrutiny at the Scottish Parliament on grounds of proportionality, affordability and feasibility in terms of practical implementation."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We have engaged with, and continue to listen to, those who work within the industry to ensure this is a licensing regime that is practicable and affordable.
"We are working closely with Police Scotland, who are helping us deliver our commitment to introduce a system that enables them to better protect our communities by taking these potentially lethal weapons out of the hands of those who would misuse them.
"It is simply not right that in a modern Scotland airguns are available without a licence. That is why we will be introducing legislation in the coming session."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article