The proportion of children who know how to play a musical instrument has almost doubled in the last 15 years, but poorer youngsters are still more likely to miss out, according to a report.
Long-term music education is often still the preserve of the rich, the study warns, with the cost of learning to play and taking lessons a "major barrier".
It also shows that technology and music trends are having an impact, with the electric guitar overtaking the violin in popularity.
The study, by ABRSM, the exam board of the Royal Schools of Music, compares the results of a new survey of youngsters with research conducted by the organisation previously.
It says about 5.5 million five to 14-year-olds (76 per cent) say they know how to play an instrument, up from 3.2 million (41 per cent) in 1999.
The study also suggests there are still significant gaps between the proportions of rich and poorer youngsters who play an instrument. About nine in 10 (90 per cent) of those from the wealthiest backgrounds will have played an instrument, according to the survey conducted by ABRSM this year, compared to 80 per cent of those from other social backgrounds.
"Children from lower socio-economic groups continue to be significantly disadvantaged compared with their peers from more affluent backgrounds," the study says.
"The cost of learning to play and of taking lessons is a major barrier and children without access to tuition are significantly less likely to carry on playing."
Lincoln Abbotts, director of strategic development at ABRSM, said: "It is hoped the report will be used to influence, change and further improve the circumstances in which children and adults engage with music.
"The political environment has shifted considerably in recent times with significant government investment, sector lead initiatives and increased enthusiasm among young people for all the extraordinary joys and benefits of making music."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article