PRESSURE is mounting on Whitehall's honours committee to scrap its quota system and give awards to a swathe of Olympians after a ministerial intervention and criticism from MPs, who this week are expected to say the honours system is not fit for purpose.
Sports Secretary Jeremy Hunt made it clear that while honours were awarded by an independent committee, this was "a special year" and athletes who had taken part in the Games should get "as much recognition as possible".
Despite the fact the honours committee is supposed to be independent of government, Prime Minister David Cameron knows there is likely to be a public backlash if only a handful of Olympians and Paralympians receive public awards in the New Year's Honours List.
While Mo Farah, the double Olympic gold medallist is widely expected to get a knighthood for his achievement this summer, the quota system means he is likely to be the only one while several civil service mandarins can expect to be granted the same award simply for long service.
However, the Commons Public Administration Committee is set to recommend an end to "gongs for jobs" in a report this week.
A source close to the committee said: "The current system has become an utter joke in poor taste. Gongs are being doled out to civil servants and businessmen just for doing their job. More deserving members of the public are being overlooked."
Sir Garth Morrison, Lord Lieutenant of East Lothian, was quoted as saying: "Too many honours are bestowed on people who are perceived simply to be doing the job for which they are paid ... whereas an equally talented, committed and hard-working individual who devotes some of his or her time to an organisation like the Scouts is much less likely (to be honoured."
It has also been suggested that some Labour members of the committee have said it is time to drop the word "empire" from the honours as it is an anachronism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article