CHARITIES such as Oxfam, the Salvation Army and the Royal British Legion will suffer a "chilling effect" on their ability to speak out on matters of public interest due to planned lobbying reforms, an expert has warned.
They are among charities which fear the Coalition Government bill on the issue being debated in the Commons tomorrow is so complex and unclear that it is likely to be "impossible" to follow.
Helen Mountfield QC warned charities will be in "fear of criminal penalty" after she was brought in to assess the impact of the reforms by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), which represents the charity and voluntary sector and has more than 10,000 members.
"Uncertainty about what the law requires is likely to have a chilling effect on freedom of expression, putting small organisations and their trustees and directors in fear of criminal penalty if they speak out on matters of public interest and concern," she wrote in a legal opinion that has been submitted to the Cabinet Office.
"The restrictions and restraints are so wide and so burdensome as arguably to amount to a disproportionate restraint on freedom of expression."
The Transparency of Lobbying, non-Party Campaigning, and Trade Union Administration Bill follows allegations about the influence of lobbyists on Government decision-making as well as the involvement of peers and MPs with lobbying groups.
The Government wants a statutory register of lobbyists, and a £390,000 cap on the amount any organisation - excluding political parties - can spend campaigning in the UK during elections.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article