A fire board has voted to disband units in two remote communities, despite a last ditch plea for a stay of execution.
Independent local councillor Eddie Hunter appealed to the Highlands and Islands Fire Board to give the communities on the island of Eigg and the Knoydart Peninsula six months to prove they could sustain a fire service presence in their midst.
Both currently have "community response units" which have for some time had to rely on the fire crew from Mallaig to tackle any house fires. But both communities believe there is an important local role for them, which would at least prevent other members of the public intervening.
However, in his report to the board, Chief Fire Officer Stewart Edgar said that £210,000 would have to be invested in each of them if they were to continue and that revenue costs for the previous five years were around £10,000 in both
He said Knoydart had only three emergency calls in the previous five years and Eigg one, and that Knoydart currently had only three firefighters and Eigg four. As a result he said they should be deemed unsustainable.
These figures and others that Mr Edgar used were challenged by local people. Mr Hunter said: "Judging by the deluge of responses from both Knoydart and Eigg, all within the space of the last three days, it is obvious they were unaware their community response units were under immediate threat of closure."
He asked that the board defer a decision for a maximum period of six months, in order for the Knoydart and Eigg communities to "energise" themselves. "I beg, I implore all of you to give the people of Eigg and Knoydart a final last chance to come to their own rescue," he said.
However, the board members, in their last meeting before becoming part of a Scotland-wide service voted 13 to eight, to disband the units.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article